
True
Orthodoxy
by
ARCHBISHOP AVERKY (+)
of
Syracuse and Holy Trinity Monastery
Few
people today know that the Orthodox Church is nothing less than
that Church which has preserved untainted the genuine teachings of
Jesus
Christ, the very teachings delivered to every subsequent generation of
believers. These teachings came down the centuries. from the Holy
Apostles,
explicated and carefully interpreted by their legitimate successors
(their
disciples and the holy Fathers), traditioned and conserved unaltered by
our Eastern
Church which is alone able to prove her right to be called "the
Orthodox
Church."
The
divine Founder of the Church, our Lord Jesus Christ, said
clearly, "I will build my Church and the gates of Hell will not prevail
against Her" (St. Matt xvi, 18). To the Church, He sent the Holy
Spirit.
The Spirit descended upon the Apostles, the Spirit of Truth (St. John
xv, 16f)
Who "manifests all things" to Her and guides Her (St. John xvi, 13),
protecting Her from error. Indeed, it was to declare this Truth to men
that the
Lord came into the cosmos, according to His own words (St. John xviii,
31). And
Saint Paul confirms this fact in his letter to his pupil, the bishop
Timothy,
saying that, "the Church of the living God is the ground and pillar of
the
Truth" (I Tim iii, 15).
Because
She is "the ground and pillar of the Truth,"
"the gates of Hell cannot prevail against Her." It follows, then,
that the true Christian Church—palpably unique since Christ established
but one
Church—has always existed on earth and will exist to the end of time.
She has
received the promise of Christ, "I will be with you even unto the end
of
the age." Can there be the slightest doubt that the Lord refers here to
the Church? Any honest and sane judgment, any act of good conscience,
anyone
familiar with the history of the Christian Church, the pure and
unaltered moral
and theological teachings of the Christian religion, must confess that
there
was but one true Church founded by our Lord, Jesus Christ, and that She
has
preserved His Truth holy and unchanged. History reveals, moreover, a
traceable
link of grace from the holy Apostles to their successors and to the
holy
Fathers. In contrast to what others have done, the Orthodox Church has
never
introduced novelties into Her teachings in order to "keep up with the
times", to be "progressive", "not to be left at the side of
the road," or to accommodate current exigencies and fashions which are
always suffused with evil. The Church never conforms to the world.
Indeed
not, for the Lord has said to his disciples at the Last
Supper, "You are not of this world." We must hold to these words if
we are to remain faithful to true Christianity—the true Church of
Christ has
always been, is and will always be a stranger to this world. Separated
from it,
she is able to transmit the divine teachings of the Lord unchanged,
because
that separation has kept Her unchanged, that is, like the immutable God
Himself. That which the learned call "conservativism" is a principal
and, perhaps, most characteristic index of the true Church.
Since the
TRUTH is given to us once and for all, our task is to
assimilate rather than to discover it. We are commanded to confirm
ourselves
and others in the Truth and thereby bring everyone to the true Faith,
Orthodoxy.
Unfortunately,
there have appeared in the very bosom of the Church,
even among the hierarchy, opinions expressed by well-known individuals
which
are detrimental to Her. The desire to "march with the times" makes
them fear that they will not be recognized as "cultured", "liberal"
and "progressive." These modern apostates to Orthodoxy are
"ashamed" to confess that our Orthodox church is precisely the Church
which was founded by our Lord Jesus Christ, the Church to which
appertains the
great promise that "the gates of Hell will not prevail against Her,"
and to which He confided the plenum of divine Truth. By their deceit
and false
humility, by their blasphemy against the Lord, these false shepherds
and those
with them have been estranged from the true Church. They have given
tacit
expression to the idea that "the gates of Hell" have
"prevailed" against the Church. In other words, these apostates say
that our holy Orthodox Church is equally "at fault" for the
"division of the churches" and ought now to "repent" her
sins and enter into union with other "Christian churches" by means of
certain concessions to them, the result being a new, indivisible church
of
Christ.
This is
the ideology of the religious movement which has become so
fashionable in our times: "The ecumenical movement" among whose
number one may count Orthodox, even our clergy. For a long time, we
have heard
that they belong to this movement in order "to witness to the peoples
of
other confessions the truth of holy Orthodoxy," but it is difficult for
us
to believe that this statement is anything more than "throwing powder
in
our eyes." Their frequent theological declarations in the international
press can lead us to no other conclusion than that they are traitors to
the
holy Truth.
As a
matter of historical fact, the "ecumenical
movement"—of which the WCC is the supreme organ—is an organization. of
purely Protestant origin. Nearly all the Orthodox Churches have joined,
the
Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia being the most notable
exception.
Even those churches behind the "iron curtain" have joined. For some
time the Russian Patriarchate resisted, flattering herself with the
purity of
her Orthodoxy and quite naturally viewing this movement as hostile to
Orthodoxy. She has since become a member.
The
Russian Synod almost stands alone in her opposition to the
"ecumenical movement." How can we explain her isolation from the rest
of "global Orthodoxy"? We must understand the situation in terms of
the words that "this Must take place" (St. Luke xxi, 9), that is, the
"great apostasy" clearly predicted by the Lord (Sol ii, 3-12).
"it is permitted by God," as [St.] Ignatius Brianchaninoff said
almost a century ago. (Another spiritual father, Theophan the Recluse,
announced with grief that the horrendous apostasy would begin within
Russia.)
[St.] Ignatius wrote: "We are helpless to arrest this apostasy.
Impotent
hands will have no power against it and nothing more will be required
than the
attempt to withold it. The spirit of the age will reveal the apostasy.
Study it,
if you wish to avoid it, if you wish to escape this age and the
temptation of
its spirits. One can suppose, too, that the institution of the Church
which has
been tottering for so long will fall terribly and suddenly. Indeed, no
one is
able to stop or prevent it. The present means to sustain the
institutional
Church are borrowed from the elements of the world, things inimical to
the
Church, and the consequence will be only to accelerate its fall.
Nevertheless,
the Lord protects the elect and their limited number will be filled."
The Enemy
of humanity makes every effort and uses all means to
confound it. Aid comes to him through the total co-operation of all the
secret
and invisible heterodox, especially those priests and bishops who
betray their
high calling and oath, the true faith and the true Church.
Repudiation
of and preservation from the apostasy which has made
such enormous progress demands that we stand apart from the spirit of
the age
(which bears the seeds of its own destruction). If we expect to
withstand the
world, it is first necessary to understand it and keep sensitively in
mind that
in this present age all that which carries the most holy and dear name
of
Orthodoxy is not in fact Orthodox. Rather, it is often "A fraudulent
and
usurped Orthodoxy" which we must fear and eschew as if it were fire.
Unlike this spurious faith, true Orthodoxy was given and must be
received
without novelty and nothing must be accepted as a teaching or practice
of the
Church which is contrary to the Holy Scriptures and the dogma of the
Universal
Church. True Orthodoxy thinks only to serve god and to save souls and
is not
preoccupied with the secular and ephemeral welfare of men. True
Orthodoxy is
spiritual and not physical or psychological or earthly. In order to
protect ourselves
from "the spirit of the age" and preserve our fidelity to the true
Orthodoxy, we ought firstly and with all our strength live blamelessly:
A total
and rigorous commitment to Christ, without deviation from the
commandments of
God or the laws of His holy Church. At the same time, we must have no
common
prayer or spiritual liaison with the modern apostasy or with anything
which
"soils" our holy Faith, even those dissidents who call themselves
"Orthodox." They will go their way and we will go ours. We must be
honorable and tenacious, following the right way, never deviating in
order to
please men or from fear that we might lose some personal advantage.
The sure
path to perdition is indifference and the lack of
principles which is euphemistically called "the larger view." In
opposition to this "larger view" we put the "rigor of
ideas" which, in modernity, it is fashionable to label "narrow"
and "fanatical." To be sure, if one adopts the "modern mentality,"
one must consider the holy martyrs—whose blood is "the cement of the
Church"—and the Church Fathers—who struggled all their lives against
heretics—as nothing less than "narrow" and "fanatical." In
truth, there is little difference between "the broad way" against
which the Lord warned and the modem "larger view." He condemned the
"broad way" as the way to "gehenna."
Of
course, the idea of "gehenna" holds no fear for those
"liberals" and avant-garde theologians. They may smugly
"theologize" about it, but in rashly and wantonly discussing
"the new ways of Orthodox theology" and acquiring a number of
disciples, they give evidence that they no longer believe in the
existence of
Hell. This new breed of "Orthodox" are really no more than modem
"scholastics."
In other
words, the way of these "progressivists" is not
our way. Their way is deceptive, and it is unfortunate that it is not
evident
to everyone. The "broader" or "larger view" alienates us
from the Lord and His true Church. It is the road away from Orthodoxy.
This
view is sinister, maliciously invented by the Devil in order to deny us
salvation. For us, however, we accept no innovations, but choose the
ancient,
proven way, the way in which true Christians have chosen to serve God
for 2,000
years.
We choose
the way of fidelity to the true Faith and not the
"modern way." We choose faithfulness to the true Church with all Her
canons and dogmas which have been received and confirmed by the local
and
universal Councils. We choose the holy customs and traditions, the
spiritual
riches of that faith transmitted complete and entire to us from the
Holy
Apostles, the Holy Fathers of the Church, and the Christian heritage of
our
venerable ancestors. This alone is the faith of the true Orthodox,
distinct
from the counterfeit "orthodoxy" invented by the Adversary. We receive
only the Apostolic Faith, the Faith of the Fathers, the Orthodox Faith.
*Reprinted
from Orthodox Christian Witness, wherein it
appeared translated from the French in La Foi Transmise (Nov. 1968),
pp. 19-22.
3.
Children in Church
by
Protopresbyter Michael Pomazansky
Every Christian mother considers it one of her primary obligations to
teach her
child prayer as soon as his consciousness begins to awaken prayer that
is
simple and easy for him to understand. His soul must be accustomed to
the warm
and fervent experience of prayer at home, by his cradle, for his
neighbors, his
family. The child's evening prayer calms and softens his soul, he
experiences
the sweetness of prayer with his little heart and catches the first
scent of
sacred feelings.
It is harder for a child to take in the atmosphere which prevails in
church. At
first he just observes. He sees people concentrating and rites he does
not as
yet understand and hears incomprehensible words. However, the very
solemnity
and festivity of the church have an uplifting effect on him. When a two
year-old child wants to take part in church, to sing, speak or make
prostrations—in this we can see his uplifted state of soul, with which
he is
involuntarily infected. We say this from simple observation.
But there is also something higher than our sense perceptions. Christ
is
invisibly present in church and He sees the child, blesses him, and
receives
him into the atmosphere of the grace of the Holy Spirit. Grace
envelopes him as
a warm wind wafts over a blade of grass in a field, helping it to grow
up
slowly and gradually, to put down roots and develop. And so the mother
hastens
to bring her child to Christ, to His grace, regardless even of whether
he has
any understanding at all of this contact with the gift of grace. This
especially concerns the Eucharist, the very closest union with Christ.
The
mother brings her infant to this mystery while he is still a baby lying
in her
arms. Is the mother right?
"Suffer the little children to come unto Me, for of such is the kingdom
of
God." Can you really say with certainty that there and then in the
fields
of Palestine these children had already understood Christ's teaching,
had been
sitting at the Teacher's feet and listening to His preaching? Do not
say this,
for the Evangelist himself remarks that "they brought unto Him also
infants, that He would touch them: but when His disciples saw it, they
rebuked
them". In bringing their little ones, the mothers' purpose was simply
that
His hands should touch the children, and not that He should teach them
divine
knowledge.
Allowing children to have contact with spiritual grace is one of the
first,
basic concerns of a Christian who thinks about his children, and the
task of
Christian society, which is concerned about its youth. Here is the door
to a
correct Orthodox Christian upbringing. Enlightenment, compunction and
joy, as
they awaken in the infant's growing consciousness are an external
indicator of
the fact that the little Christian is feeling warmth from the divine
source in
himself. And even if he does not feel it, the invisible action of God's
grace
does not stop; only we do not see it, just as we do not see the effect
of the
sun on our own health instantly and at once. In Russian literature we
have such
apt examples of the disposition of children's souls during preparation
for
confession and communion, after confession and after communion of the
Holy
Mysteries.
Nevertheless, how often it is forgotten that herein lies the key to
organizing
religious education. How often, on seeing the inadequacy of religious
education, we pick up the programs and re-work them, lay the blame on
the
textbooks and the teachers—and forget about the importance of the
church and
the influence of the services; certainly we do not always ask ourselves
the
question: "But did the children go to church?"
As the child grows tip, he should enter more deeply into the life, of
the
Church. The child's mind, the youth's mind must be enlightened by the
church
services, learn from them, become immersed in them; the church should
give him
knowledge of God.
This matter is more complex. The task of religious 'education will be
fulfilled
only when we teach our children to love church.
When we, the adults, organize church services, make arrangements for
them,
shorten or lengthen the order of service and so on, we are
accommodating
ourselves to our own concepts and needs, or simply convenience,
understood in
adult terms. But in so far as the concepts, needs and spiritual
strivings of
children are not taken into account, the surroundings are often not
conducive
towards making children love church. This is nevertheless one of the
most
important means of religious education: let the children come to love
the church,
so that they may always attend church with a pleasant feeling and
receive
spiritual nourishment from it. And since parents often cannot help
here, if
only because not, infrequently they are irreligious themselves, we are
often
compelled, when we think about our Orthodox children, to place this
work into
the hands of the community, the hands of the school, the hands of the
Church.
Just as we are not afraid of destroying a devotion to learning and
books, or
love for our national literature and history by making our children
come
running to class at the sound of a bell and sit at desks, and by
immersing them
in an atmosphere of strict discipline and compulsion; so also, one
might think,
we would have no reason to be afraid of using a certain amount of
compulsion in
the matter of attending church, whether it be part of school regime or
an
expression of self-discipline on the part of youth organizations—both
those
that are connected with school and those that are not. But certainly,
if this
remains just compulsion, and to such an extent that it creates a
psychological
repulsion in the young people—this will show that the aim has not been
attained, that the method has proved to be inadequate and the
compulsion in
vain. Let the child brought by our will express a desire to remain
there
through his own will. Then you will have justified your action.
And again we say: it is not only natural, psychological effects that
take place
in children's souls in church, but the action of grace. Our whole
concern
should be that the soul of the baby, child or youth should not be
closed to
holy impressions, but should be freely opened: and then it will no
longer need
effort, force or any other form of self-compulsion; it will be
nourished freely
and easily and joyfully.
There is one thing that must not be forgotten: human nature requires at
least a
minimal degree of active participation. In church this can take the
form either
of reading, or of singing, or of decorating and cleaning the church, or
of some
other activity, even if it is only indirectly connected with the
services.
The indisputable importance of the church and of communal church
services for
the religious upbringing of children constitutes one of the arguments
in favour
of the Orthodox understanding of the mystery of baptism: that is to
say, an
argument in favor of baptizing children at a very young age, as we do
in the
Orthodox Church. Baptism is the door through which one enters the
Church of
Christ. One who is not baptized—which means he is not a member of
Christ's
family—has no right to participate in the life of this family, in its
spiritual
gatherings and in its table—the Lord's table. Thus our children would
be
deprived of the right to be with us in church, to receive the blessing
in the
name of the Holy Trinity, to communicate the Body and Blood of Christ.
And
however we may influence them in our family at home, however much we
might
teach them the Gospel, we would be depriving them of the direct action
of
heavenly grace, and at best we would arouse a thirst for faith in
them—but we
would still be keeping them far from the heavenly light and warmth,
which comes
down, regardless of our human efforts, in the mysteries, in all the
services,
in holy prayers. How grossly mistaken are those religions which
recognize only
adult baptism!
The holy maidens Faith, Hope and Charity, and the holy young bride
Perpetua,
who became martyrs, are witnesses to the fact that adolescence is an
age
prepared even for the highest active participation in Christ's Church.
The baby
in his mother's arms in church who cried out, "Ambrose for bishop!",
and by his exclamation determined the choice of the renowned Ambrose of
Milan
for the episcopal cathedra—this baby is a defender of children's rights
to an
active participation in Christ's Church.
And so let us take some trouble over our children: first let us give
them the
chance to take more part in church—and in a wider and more elevated
form than
just giving the censer to the priest; and secondly, let us adapt
ourselves
somewhat to our children when praying together with them.
Let the children be conscious that they are members of Christ's family.
Let the children come to love church!
4. Rendering Unto the Lord in the new Israel
by METROPOLITAN MOSES (+)
of Seattle
When Jacob departed from his father, Isaac, after he saw the vision
of the ladder descending from heaven, he vowed, If God will be with me,
and will keep me in this way that I go, and will give me bread to eat,
and raiment to put on, so that I come again to my father's house in
peace; then shall the LORD be my God: And this stone, which I have set
for a pillar, shall be God's house: and of all that Thou shalt give me
I will surely give the tenth unto Thee. And of all that you give me I
will surely give one tenth to you. (Genesis 28:20-22)
In the days of the Prophet Moses it was commanded by God, All
tithes from the land, whether the seed from the ground or the fruit
from the tree, are the Lord's; they are holy to the Lord. (Leviticus
27:30)
The tithe served two purposes. One was to provide for the expenses
of the Temple and the support of the priests, etc., and the other was
to remind the believer that all of his material blessings ultimately
came from God. The God of Israel admonished His people thus:
Beware lest you say in your heart, My power and the might of my
hand has given me this wealth. You shall remember the Lord your God,
for it is He who gives you power to get wealth. (Deuteronomy 8:17-18)
The Prophet King David understood that God was the source of all
his blessings and prayed:
But who am I, and what is my people, that we should be able thus to
offer willingly For all things come from Thee, and of Thy own have we
given Thee Lord our God, all this abundance that we have provided for
building Thee a house for Thy holy name comes from Thy hand and is all
Thine own. (Chronicles 29:14-16)
Later in the Old Testament the Holy Spirit speaking through the
Prophet Malachi chastised some of the children of Israel for
withholding their offerings saying, Will man rob God? Yet you are
robbing me. But you say, How are we robbing Thee? In your tithes and
offerings? Bring the full tithe into the storehouse. (Malachi 3:8-10)
Some erroneously say that tithing was an Old Testament requirement,
but is not required in the New Testament.
Yet in His parable of the men who were each given talents according
to their ability, our Savior admonished them to trade until His return.
Furthermore, the man who hid his talent in the earth was rebuked. (Matt
25:27)
Elsewhere our Lord said, He that is faithful in that which is least
is faithful also in much: and he that is unjust in the least is unjust
also in much. If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous
mammon, who will entrust you with that which is true? And if ye have
not been faithful in that which is another's, who shall give you that
which is your own? No servant can serve two masters: for either he will
hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and
despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and Mammon. And the Pharisees
also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided Him.
And He said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men;
but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among
men is abomination in the sight of God. (St Luke 16:10-15)
Here our Savior Himself illustrates a spiritual truth. If we are
faithful to God and recognize that abundance is a gift from Him of
which we are called upon to make a small return, then we serve God. If
we do not recognize this spiritual truth and are overly attached to
things material, we serve Mammon. It is an either/or proposition. Some
personal money management advisors agree with this principle and
suggest that one is not really in control of one's money if one cannot
give a portion of it to charity. The maxim here is that it is not how
much one makes, it is how one manages it.
Our Savior told the Jews of His day to remember the weightier
matters of the law, judgment, mercy and faith and not leave the tithe
undone. (Matt 23:23). The early Christians were fervent and did not
limit themselves to the tithe. It is written in the Acts of the
Apostles that the dwellers in Jerusalem held all things in common. This
is not possible in the Church today, except in Coenobitic monasticism,
but we all can remember the words of Saint Paul, But this I say, He
which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly; and he which soweth
bountifully shall reap also bountifully. Every man according as he
purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of
necessity, for God loveth a cheerful giver. (2Co 9:6-7)
Saint Paul requested a systematic contribution of the Christians of
his day, saying, On the first day of every week [the Lord's Day], each
of you is to put aside and save whatever extra you earn. (1Corinthians
16:2) And Saint Peter admonished all, As every man hath received the
gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the
manifold grace of God. (1 Peter 4:10)
Parents struggle to form their children in Christ. How can a parent
tell if their labors are bearing fruit in their children? One way to
assess your child's commitment to Christ is to encourage him to tithe.
It is easy to profess with the lips, but a child who tithes is actively
pursuing the life in Christ.
Tithing symbolizes and helps express your commitment to Christ and
His Church. Not everyone can find it within himself to begin with a ten
percent tithe. To these believers we suggest beginning with a lesser
percentage and prayerfully making an effort to gradually arrive at the
scripturally prescribed level of giving. It is easier to reach one's
goals if one's gift to the Church is treated as an expense and part of
the monthly budget.
A regular plan for giving can help enrich your spiritual life.
Through giving we offer ourselves in service and devotion to God. We
become stronger in faith and more aware of others needs and we
experience the joy of sharing with others in Christ. Furthermore, it
can help accomplish the Church's mission. Reliable funding allows the
church to plan for expenses, carry out programs, maintain outreach
activities and help those in need.
Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh
down from the Father of lights, with Whom is no variableness, neither
shadow of change. (James 1:17)
A regular plan for giving can help enrich your spiritual life.
Through
giving we offer ourselves in service and devotion to God. We become
stronger in faith and more aware of others' needs and we experience the
joy
of sharing with others in Christ. Furthermore, it can help accomplish
the
Church's mission. Reliable funding allows the church to plan for
expenses,
carry out programs, maintain outreach activities and help those in
need.
"Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down
from
the Father of lights, with Whom is no variableness, neither shadow of
change." (James 1:17)
The good gifts are all that relate to our material well being, the
perfect
gift is membership in the Body of Christ and participation in Divine
Grace,
especially the Holy Mysteries. Our God is the Alpha and the Omega, the
Beginning and the End, of all things. In this life He gives us the
opportunity to give something back. Do not miss the opportunity to make
a
small return for His love and beneficence.
The purpose of this tract is to help Christians, the New Israel,
understand what is required in rendering one's gift unto the Lord. The
Old Testament guideline for giving was a tithe, a voluntary, systematic
contribution of one tenth of one's total income. Another name for this
practice is proportional giving. There are many examples of this sacred
tradition in scripture.
EASTER DATE REPONSE
Letters to the Editor
(Orthodox Observer, June 2002)*
Editor,
In response to your many letters regarding our Paschal traditions, I would like to offer another perspective, particularly in regards to our family having "two Easters."
I am cradle Greek Orthodox, one of three children, and the only one who continues to be Orthodox. One brother does not practice any faith, and the other has become part of a Protestant nondenominational "big-box" church.
My husband was raised Roman Catholic, but was Chrismated on Palm Sunday. We live in an area that is overflowing with Protestant churches and Mormons trying to "include" our children in their activity nights; the pressures on our children are constant. Our family members are celebrating Easter at a different time and a different way than we do as Orthodox. Bill and I consider this a unique blessing of our faith, because it offers our children the opportunity to see the stark differences in our Orthodox worship and practice, and those of other faiths.
For example, several years ago, my "born-again" sister-in-law invited us to attend Easter services at their church. Their service was half musical production and half Jerry Springer.
To this day, my children recall some of what they heard and saw that day with amazement that that is how some people think Pascha is to he practiced and observed. I personally will never forget, after one woman's recounting of how Christ was in her life, having my then nine-year old son turn and ask me what "incest" meant.
We are able to attend Bill's non-practicing parents' annual Easter egg hunt, when the children get their Easter baskets from the Easter Bunny, and our children understand that is a fun tradition at grandma and granddad's house. This is commercial Easter, not really Easter to my children.
My sons' spiritual investment is in Lent and Pascha. These they approach with reverence, and awe. They understand that Lent in its observance and lessons is a gift given to us to become the best people we can be. They look forward to Holy Week. My eight-year old son softly and lovingly sings, "...and Joseph took his body, and he laid it in the tomb." This is Orthodoxy; my children know they are Orthodox.
They actually know what happened to Christ in his last week and that he was crucified ─ something my sister-in-law hides from her children, because it is too violent. (She also can't imagine that communion is the precious Blood and Body of our Lord.)
Knowing and being aware of the contrast in our reverence for our Lord, how he died and rose on the third day are essential to my children continuing their Orthodox faith, because they know other Christian faiths don't practice Christianity the way we do.
Two Easters "ridiculous?" Not an advantage at my house.
"Idiosyncratic?" No, faithful. Our reckoning for Pascha is a testimony of our preservation of that which the Apostles taught us. Our continuity is a treasure.
Confusing? Not for my children. We love to have the opportunity to answer questions and share our faith in with community that has no idea what Orthodoxy is. I am proud to walk into my school office and tell them that my children will be out of school at certain times because we are Orthodox, and it is our Holy Week.
I don't envy my Christian brothers and sisters united in their observance of Easter, because they have lost the truth and fullness of faith, and the separation of the dates is witness to that fact. Our faith has withstood many tests in 2000 years, let's not change now ─ our family (mine and all of yours) has too much to lose.
Margaret Mueller
Roseville, California
Editor's Note: Margaret, you should be put in charge of the Greek Archdiocese.
* The Orthodox Observer
is the official
publication of the new calendar Greek Archdiocese of North and South
America.